KT
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 results missed Street expectations: collaboration revenue $2.76M vs consensus $23.55M and EPS ($0.94) vs ($0.78), driven by minimal revenue recognition and higher R&D plus a $3.86M impairment charge; stock catalyst shifts to December KT-621 Phase 1b AD data readout . Estimates marked with * (values retrieved from S&P Global).
- Cash balance $978.7M provides runway into 2H 2028, funding parallel Phase 2b programs in AD and asthma, KT-579 Phase 1 start, and initial Phase 3 activities, with adjusted cash OpEx slightly lower sequentially per CFO .
- KT-621 program execution: BroADen Phase 1b enrollment/dosing completed with biomarker/clinical endpoints to be shared in December; BROADEN2 Phase 2b AD trial initiated; BREADTH Phase 2b asthma to start in Q1 2026 .
- Pipeline momentum: KT-579 (IRF5) IND-enabling complete; Phase 1 to begin early 2026; partnered IRAK4 (KT-485) expected to enter Phase 1 in 2026; CDK2 molecular glue collaboration with Gilead progressing .
- Near-term narrative drivers: Dupilumab-like biomarker bar (70–80% TARC reduction at Week 4) for KT-621, placebo mitigation in AD trials, and dose-ranging across AD/asthma to enable Phase 3 selection; management emphasizes first-and-best positioning and capital discipline .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- KT-621 STAT6 program milestones: completed Phase 1b enrollment/dosing in moderate-to-severe AD; initiated BROADEN2 Phase 2b AD; asthma Phase 2b on track for Q1 2026 .
- Strong liquidity and runway to 2H 2028, supporting multiple clinical inflection points and initial Phase 3 activities; CFO reiterated runway excludes unearned milestones from partners .
- IRF5 KT-579 progressed: IND-enabling complete; robust preclinical efficacy across lupus/RA; Phase 1 to start early 2026 .
Selected quotes:
- “We’ve completed patient enrollment and dosing in the KT-621 BroADen Phase 1b trial in AD… and we plan to share the full data set next month.”
- “We ended September with a cash balance of $978.7 million, providing a cash runway into the second half of 2028.”
- “KT-579’s compelling and consistent preclinical data… underscores the transformative potential of targeted protein degradation to address the pathogenic functions of IRF5.”
What Went Wrong
- Topline financials missed Street: revenue $2.76M vs $23.55M*; EPS ($0.94) vs ($0.78)*, reflecting lower collaboration revenue recognition in Q3 and elevated R&D plus a $3.86M impairment .
- YoY operating expenses rose to $95.3M vs $75.9M in Q3’24, driven by STAT6 investment and organizational growth; net loss widened to ($82.2M) vs ($62.5M) YoY .
- Sequential revenue drop from $11.48M in Q2 to $2.76M in Q3, following recognition of remaining deferred revenue from Sanofi in Q2 and Q3 revenue attributable to Gilead only .
Financial Results
Core P&L and EPS vs prior periods and YoY
Estimates vs Actuals (Q3 2025)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Expense and Cash KPIs
Collaboration Revenue Breakdown
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We’ve completed patient enrollment and dosing in the KT-621 BroADen Phase 1b trial… and we plan to share the full data set next month.” — Nello Mainolfi, CEO
- “We ended September with a cash balance of $978.7 million, providing a cash runway into the second half of 2028.” — Bruce Jacobs, CFO
- “We entered the Broaden study expecting clinical activity of KT-621 to be in the range of what dupi delivered at four weeks… with all the caveats of small n’s and the lack of a placebo.” — Nello Mainolfi
- “The study is powered to enable us… to look across the three different doses and to see if we can discern any sort of a dose response.” — Jared Gollob, CMO
- “We don’t do resource allocation because we have money. We allocate capital because we earn the right to do more.” — Nello Mainolfi
Q&A Highlights
- Differentiation vs dupilumab: Management frames KT-621 as blocking IL-4/IL-13 signaling via STAT6 as effectively as upstream biologics, aiming for a “dupilumab-in-a-pill” profile; hesitant to assert superiority a priori .
- Dose strategy: Phase 1b used two doses to translate degradation from HV to patients; Phase 2b uses three doses spanning sub-optimal to maximal pharmacology to see dose response .
- Patient mix and placebo: Expect substantial naïve-to-advanced therapy enrollment across global sites; placebo mitigation via protocol rigor, experienced raters/training, and tight sponsor oversight .
- Durability/adherence: Daily oral dosing supports steady-state blockade; biomarker suppression in HV continued through 14 days, with gradual recovery only after stopping; degraders may maintain pharmacology despite occasional missed doses .
- Capital allocation: Despite high cash, emphasis on milestone-driven deployment with KT-621 prioritized but not at the expense of broader mission and pipeline .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 revenue and EPS missed Street consensus: $2.76M vs $23.55M* and ($0.94) vs ($0.78)*, respectively, reflecting the absence of large collaboration revenue recognition (Q2 recognized remaining Sanofi deferred; Q3 revenue from Gilead only) and higher R&D plus a $3.86M impairment .
- Estimate revisions likely to temper near-term revenue/EPS given collaboration-dependence and stepped-up program investment; the December KT-621 biomarker/clinical readout is the pivotal driver for sentiment and model updates.
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q3 headline miss is less thesis-relevant; focus shifts to December KT-621 Phase 1b AD data (biomarkers and early clinical endpoints) as the primary stock catalyst .
- Liquidity is robust with $978.7M and runway to 2H 2028, enabling parallel Phase 2b (AD/asthma), KT-579 Phase 1 entry, and initial Phase 3 preparations without immediate financing risk .
- Management sets a clear biomarker bar (TARC 70–80% at Week 4) aligned with dupilumab; meeting this could validate the “biologics-like” oral story and support Phase 3 dose selection .
- Placebo risk in AD studies is being actively mitigated (protocol, rater quality, sponsor oversight), a constructive signal for Phase 2b readthrough .
- Revenue variability will persist given collaboration accounting; model focus should be on cash runway, OpEx trajectory, and pipeline milestones rather than quarterly revenue prints .
- Competitive positioning emphasizes degrader pharmacology over STAT6 inhibition; first-and-best strategy plus rapid execution could secure category leadership if clinical data align .
- Near-term trade: Setup into December readout with clear management expectations; medium-term thesis hinges on Phase 2b execution across AD/asthma and IRF5 clinical validation in 2026 .